Wednesday, December 31, 2014

A brush w/greatness (aka See, I do listen to something besides U2)

Back in the fall of 1994, I spent a semester abroad in London.  I can still find our tube station and where we lived with street view on Google maps.  That's pretty cool, although everything has clearly changed.

Anyway, one of the awesome things about being in London in 1994 was the open air markets.  Not quite flea markets, but a definite cousin.  More like Pike's Market in Seattle for those of you who have been.  There was Covent Garden on Sundays, and Camden Towne just about any day of the week.  In stalls that were often little more than folding tables, tarps, rope, and duct tape, you could find trendy (knockoff) fashions, the latest club-wear, jewelry, get your hair done, Doc Martens (literal cardboard fortresses made from those boxes), watches, electronics, and... bootleg CDs. %$#@! yeah.

This was before the world went whole hog on the interweb, and things like peer to peer file sharing and illegal downloads became so commonplace.  You could find your vendor, and they'd have row upon row of CDs in their various trays and cases.  And everything was in order.  It may have been illegal, but dammit they had a business to run and they were professionals.  So you'd find something that grabbed you, and they'd let you listen and preview it right there on the stereo they brought.  Listening stations! 

So you'd listen to a CD you were keen about.  Maybe it was broadcast quality, something from the mixing desk, or maybe it sounds like it was recorded from the last row in the upperdeck. Maybe the whole show sounded awesome from start to finish.  Or maybe it didn't, but there was a song from that one album you love that rarely gets played live, so you were only too happy to spend the money.  A single disc would cost 15 - 20 pounds.  You were spending a lot of money. But with labels like Kiss the Stone Records, Octopuss Records, amongst others, you usually got decent to really good cover art, track listings, and picture discs.

My cash pretty much went to beer, food, and bootleg CDs (coming home, landing in Dallas and getting those through customs scared the crap out of me more than it probably needed to).

One Sunday at Covent Garden I came across a really good Crowded House CD.  It was from a show earlier in '94 at the Hammersmith theater in London.  Really great show, broadcast quality. 

Now you might be thinking, "Crowded House?  Really?"  Even though they only really charted with their first album here in the U.S., they continued to be successful internationally and making great albums.  Plus Neil Finn, lead singer and songwriter of the band, has had a great run going back to his Split Enz days, albums with his brother Tim, as well as his solo stuff.  So there's an impressive catalog.

Anyway, track 3 on this disc is supposed to be "Distant Sun" from their Together Alone album.  But at this show, something happens at the intro of the song, causing the band to stop playing.  Band techs come onstage, and the various band members start goofing off about what's going on.

In the course of all of this, Mark Hart, who had joined the band for that album and tour, is being teased by the other band members.  All of a sudden he starts playing the opening notes of "Born on the Bayou", a true Fogerty classic.  The rest of the band all kick into an awesome cover of the song.  Its one of the reasons this disc was so good, and an example of why we pay money to see the bands we love, live and in person.

And then lo and behold, there's a youtube video with the audio in question.

Don't ask me what the hell's going with this video, though.

Not long after this, Paul Hester, the band's drummer, would leave the band.  In 1996, the band would reunite with Hester to play a massive farewell show outside of the Sydney Opera House.  They would go their separate ways and Neil Finn would embark a solo career.
Best last song, ever?

Fans would hope for a reunion, but sadly in 2005, Paul Hester would commit suicide.

However, a few years later, Neil Finn started working on another solo album, but reached out to the surviving members of the band and decided to record a new Crowded House album, Time On Earth.  They held auditions for a new drummer, and ended up bringing Matt Sherrod on board.

Jump to September 2007.  

Nope.  First, jump back to February 2003, aka Brush with Greatness Part 1.

Neil Finn's doing a solo show at the Fine Line.  It's the first encore.  I'm standing near the front of the stage when Neil asks us whether he should "Private Universe" or another tune, can't remember which one.  I say, "Why not play them both?"  He looks at me and says, "Are you insane?  We couldn't possibly do that."  And THAT was our first, and only, conversation.

Jump to July 2004, aka Brush with Greatness Part 2.

Neil and his brother, Tim, are touring as, yep, the Finn Brothers.  I'm front row at the Guthrie, the REAL Guthrie, and show's over.  They're walking around slapping and shaking hands and Neil comes by and shakes my hand.  It was cool



Okay, NOW jump to September 2007, aka Brush with Greatness Part 3.

The reunited band is coming to Minneapolis to play the Orpheum.  I go to the Orpheum box office the morning tickets go on sale and get second row tickets just off the center section.  In other words, awesome seats. 

My buddy Grant goes with me to see the show.  That night we're walking to the theater, when I see Matt Sherrod, the new drummer, sitting out in front of the Orpheum having a smoke. People are all walking past him as if they have no idea who he is.  I stop and go, "Hey Matt!"  and shake his hand.  He returns my greeting.  I congratulate him on joining the band and his success and tell him I'm looking forward to the show.  He grins, thanks me and I figure I'll just leave him alone now, because he just wanted to chill and have a smoke.

Great seats, great show.  It's sold out.  The place is going nuts for their return.  Neil's son, Liam, opens the show as a one man band.  Pretty cool.  Pete Yorn comes on next, even better.  And then the band finally hits the stage.  People of course are yelling requests for their favorite Crowded House songs. I decide I'm going to do something quite the opposite.

About 1/3 of the way into the show, they complete a song, everybody yells, but then the place goes absolutely quiet.  Now's my chance.  I stand up on my chair, look over at Mark Hart, who's on the left side of the stage, and say, "Hey Mark!  How 'bout a little Born on the Bayou!"  He looks over at me, right at me!  He looks over at me and gets a big grin on his face.  Neil Finn looks at me, looks at Mark Hart, and says, "We can do that."  YES!!!  But then Mark just replies, "We'll do it later."  GUH! Fail!

They're not going to play it.  I know he said they would, but there's no way they're going to re-work the whole setlist/show based on my suggestion.  But I take it as a moral victory.  I connected with the band for a few seconds, and the leader of the band was ready to give me what I wanted.  Glass is half-full.

I still hold out hope, though.  But by the end of the first part of the show and the beginning of the encore, I knew they were not going to do it.  Leaned over to Grant and told him, "They're not going to do it."

But then a couple of songs into the encore, Mark starts playing those familiar notes.  HOLY CRAP!!  They did it!  I can't believe it!  They actually did it.  It was an abbreviated version, but they played "Born on the Bayou." I changed the show!  Holy F'ing Crap.  Greatest. Concert. Moment. Ever. Victory is mine!

Jump ahead 4 1/2 years.

The Crowded House Facebook page announces that they're selling a 3 disc collection of the best stuff from their 2010 North American tour.  Of course I buy it. But in the course of finding that, I discover there's a website called crowdedhouselive.com, where you can purchase and DL other live shows.  I see they have shows not only from 2010, but 2007.  They have the shows I was at.  So yeah, I buy those, and two others. 

As soon as the Mpls Orpheum show is DL'd, I proceed to look for the golden moment.
Find it.  At the end of the 10th song of the night, "Don't Dream it's Over."  It's not exactly silent in the place, they way I remember it.  People are yelling their requests.  But it's definite pause in the set, my gut tells me this is my chance.

And I yell, "Mark play Born on the Bayou!!"  Nope, not exactly a friendly suggestion.  It was pretty rushed, as I apparently feared someone would shout their suggestion over mine.  In fact, by calling him out by name, as if we have a vibe, I risked being mocked and ridiculed for sounding like a complete douche.

But a funny thing happened,somebody else yelled, "Yeah, Born on the Bayouuuu!!"  Now, maybe they understood the reference, or maybe they were just hammered and ready to support anyone's idea.  But, they supported mine.  And Neil Finn actually said, "Can if you want Mark.  There's a genuine request from the audience tonight."  So Neil double affirmed me.  

It's also entirely possible, if not likely, that neither one of them looked at or saw me, because of the lights, and were only looking in my general direction.  But in my mind, they saw me.

This version of Born on the Bayou wasn't as good as the '94 version, but the point is they did it, and they meant it.  And that was awesome.  And now I have a recording of it.  It has been captured and saved for posterity.  And it deserves to be the "Oh no, is he telling the 'Born on the Bayou' story again?" story.

Elvis vs The Beatles

Ali vs Frazier.

Coke vs Pepsi.

Pronto Pups vs corn dogs.

Great contests and debates that learned and passionate people have engaged in for years.  (Okay, maybe not so much the Pronto Pups & corn dogs.  Because, y'know, Pronto Pups.)

Surely, Elvis vs the Beatles is counted amongst them.

Well, okay, there's probably been far more intense debates, involving pints and 16 oz bottles, in bars and by campfires over the years about the Beatles and the Stones. And it's probably even an apples and oranges comparison. Elvis was a singer, an entertainer.  He didn't stray too far from who he was and what he did.  The Beatles were songwriters, a band.  They took risks, explored, they were artists.

And yet, how can they not be compared?  Album sales, cultural impact, body of work.  You find them at the headwaters of generations of pop stars, musicians, and probably more that nobody's heard of.  (And, yes, there are many even further up those waters that influenced Elvis, John, Paul, George, and Ringo.)

I'm not even sure what the ultimate question here would be.  Who's more popular? Who's better?  Who's influence was greatest?

The Numbers

They both sold a $%#@ ton of records, tapes, and CDs.  The Beatles are the best selling band, Elvis the best selling artist.  The Beatles are the all time #1, and Elvis #2.  Both having moved over 200 million "units".  Probably a lot of overlap on those #'s. And both bought each other's records.

Film

For sheer body of work, Elvis gets the nod with some 30 odd movies.  And his movies were popular.  Yes, in most of them he played a guy who was a [name of profession], who also happened to sing.  Pretty simple & effective formula. People love to hear Elvis sing, they'll love him singing in a movie, and then they'll love listening to what he sang in the movie on the movie soundtrack.  You put all that together, and you get a big mother#$%@in' movie check.

Critical successes?  Not so much.  

The Albums

The amount of releases for Elvis and the Beatles is crazy nuts.  You have the original releases, and then the greatest hits albums, collected editions, special editions, box sets, special edition collected box sets.  Crazy redicunuts.  And it also speaks to how we're all kind of a bunch of suckers for continuing to buy the same thing that's just been wrapped differently. But that's why we're fans.

Having said that, when you talk about original releases, the edge has to go to the Beatles.   Help, Rubber Soul, Revolver, Sgt. Pepper, Abbey Road, Let it Be, even the most casual of fans can claim to have a favorite Beatles album.

If had a gun pointed at my TV, I couldn't name an original Elvis album.  And speaking of TV...


Television

Before Kim Kardashian ever tried to break the internet, Elvis and the Beatles damn near broke TV.  Both showed up on Ed Sullivan and bajillions of people watched them. More on TV in a bit.

Etc.

Well, both John Lennon and Elvis were the subjects of biographies penned by Albert Goldman.  Both pieces were widely considered third rate, hatchet jobs.

Paul McCartney was kicked out of a country over drugs.  Elvis showed up unannounced, with a GUN, to see the president, got in to see him, and walked out with a DEA badge.  (And people think the Secret Service has dropped the ball with the president today.)


The Beatles were each visible activists for any number of causes. The King, not so much (although his generosity and charity were the stuff of folklore).

Many artists & performers may have loved Elvis, but many, many more, from country acts, to rock, alternative, punk, and even metal, wanted to be in the Beatles.

Having said that...

Yep, John, Paul, George, and Ringo went to meet Elvis.  Not vice versa.  And while Elvis might have liked their music, the Beatles idolized him.  But the thing, for me, that kinda' clinches it? This...

The '68 Comeback Special

Legend has it that the idea for the show was sparked when Elvis was walking alone on Hollywood Boulevard, and nobody recognized him.  But even if that's not true, his film & recording career had started to slide, particularly with the onset of the British invasion.  And for one of the few times in his career, Elvis ignored Col. Tom Parker's vision (who wanted a more traditional holiday standards show, and may have even attempted to sabotage what the show eventually became), and instead placed his trust in the vision of producer/director Steve Binder.  And what we got was one of the all time great pop music performances ever captured on film.

The Beatles may have been the Fab Four, but this was The King.




I read that Elvis allegedly told Binder upon completion of the project that he was never going to do something that he didn't care about ever again.  If only that had held true.  Not long after this, he returned to touring.  

The Beatles split up in 1970, but Elvis continued.  And for several years, he delivered great performances.  Yeah, John, Paul, George, and Ringo all had successful solo careers, but strictly speaking, Elvis outlasted the Beatles.  Unfortunately, outlasting doesn't necessarily mean he did so gracefully.  The 1973 Aloha from Hawaii concert was another cultural benchmark, but from there his marriage fell apart, he continued to spiral downward into addiction and finally passed in '77.

Mark Chapman assassinated John Lennon in '80, thus ending all hopes for a true Beatles reunion.  There was a sorta' reunion in the mid-90's with the Beatles Anthology.  Cancer took Harrison in 2001.  And Ringo & Paul kept being Ringo & Paul.  And still get together and do stuff like this...


And now I'm kinda' like, "What was my %$#@in' point?"  I don't know. I think I was going to try some sort of boxing analogy and give it to Elvis with a split decision.  But again, what's the point?  Both were massive, both were cultural zeitgeists.   And both ended far, far before their time.

Sunday, December 28, 2014

Do I listen to anything B-sides U2? Well, yes, but this isn't about that.

I love buying digital music.  I think it's great having access to a nearly unlimited library of music that I can buy and download in minutes. Do I miss actually going to stores and buying music? Sure.  I dug hitting Title Wave and walking out with a handful of cassettes.  And who amongst us hasn't experienced a sore lower back as we leaned over and click-clacked our way through each row of new arrivals at Cheapo?  

But something that has been lost is the curiosity and excitement that comes with buying singles and checking out the B-sides.  Whether it was 45's, cassettes, or CDs, singles could have unreleased tracks, remixes, covers, or live versions that you weren't going to find anywhere else.  You might like it, or you might hate it.  The record store became a casino, and you were a gambler.  And win or lose, you always came back.

On the flip-side, what I don't miss is buying entire albums just to get one song.  I'm looking at you soundtracks! Yes, we bought them because we were fans.  And we would find other songs on those collections that we enjoyed, too.  But we knew we were dropping our money just to get to that one song.


Strictly speaking, the B-side isn't gone.  It's just something else now.  It's a "bonus track" on a "deluxe" edition.  And you get to preview it.  You get 30 - 90 seconds to decide if you want to buy it.  Or you don't bother, because it will likely end up on Youtube, where you can listen to the whole thing as much you want to.

Having said all of that, as some of you know, I'm particular to that quartet of 50-somethings from Ireland, U2. And I thought I'd take some time to compile a list of my favorite B-sides and other non-album tracks.    

"Spanish Eyes", B-side to "I Still Haven't Found What I'm Looking For", 1987

Listening to this track, you get the sense that it was "this close" to being included on The Joshua Tree.  If there had been room for just one more song, it would have fit comfortably with the rest.  Pretty key element for a solid B-side.


"Christmas (Baby Please Come Home)", from A Very Special Christmas, 1987

From the first release in the Very Special album series benefitting Special Olympics, this is a cover of the Darlene Love classic, with Love herself providing backing vocals.  So it definitely honors the original.  Great tune, and a sign of things to come.


"Hallelujah (Here She Comes)", B-side to "Desire", 1988

Rattle & Hum, I think, is a pretty unfairly maligned album.  It sold millions of copies and had some great tunes on it.  It may have not gotten great reviews, but it didn't get lousy reviews, either.  Much of the criticisms seemed to come from the fact with Joshua Tree, they released one of the best selling albums of all time, and thus became the biggest band in the world.  Rattle & Hum seemed to suggest that they knew it.  Maybe if they cut back on the covers and live versions of Joshua Tree tracks, and instead included tracks like this on the main release, some of the reactions might have been more positive.

"Hallelujah (Here She Comes)" is very representative of the band's exploration of American roots music; gospel, classic rhythm n' blues, etc.  This, driven by the organs and percussion, you start tappin' your foot, bobbin' your head, and you're hooked.


Honorable Mention: "Desire (Hollywood Remix)", B-side to "Desire" (duh), 1988

A good remix should do enough to make an original release sound unique and different, but not sound completely alien & unrecognizable (i.e. "club remixes").  And U2 is as guilty as anyone of this.  But this, this is what a remix ought to be.


"A Room at the Heartbreak Hotel", B-side to "Angel of Harlem", 1988

The opening hymnal-esque organ, the soulful backing vocals, the jump in tempo in the final act of the song, the volume of Edge's guitar, it's pretty much gone from exploration to full on love affair with roots music on this one.  "For primitive love and a ride on the mystery train..."  I'm not sure exactly what that means, but it's probably about sex. 


"Night and Day", from Red Hot + Blue, 1990

The first release in the Red Hot series, supporting said organization's efforts to raise funds for AIDS relief and awareness.  This album was a collection of Cole Porter covers.  This track is just flat out cool.  And it was our first indication of just how much things were going to change with Achtung Baby.


"Hold Me, Thrill Me, Kiss Me, Kill Me", from Batman Forever, 1995

There's plenty to be unhappy about when it comes to Joel Schumacher's Batman Forever, but this song isn't one of them.  It was originally a product of the Zooropa sessions, and given how this turned out, curious as to why it wasn't included on that album.  It just kinda' kicks ass.


"The Ground Beneath Her Feet", from The Million Dollar Hotel, 2000

The Million Dollar Hotel could probably be described as a bit of a "vanity project."  Bono came up with the story many years earlier, it was directed by Wim Wenders, it was poorly reviewed, and barely anyone saw it (which is pretty much vanity projects).  The lyrics for the song are credited to author Salman Rushdie, because they're taken from his book of the same name.  And while the film was ill advised, the song was not.  

"Let me love you, let me rescue me, let me bring you to where two roads meet..."  Not exactly sure what this is about, either.  As with most rock songs, again, there's a decent chance it's about sex.  But there's a definite sense of yearning and desperation here.  


"Invisible", 2014

Really, really dig this one.  Recorded during the sessions that produced the Songs of Innocence album, this was free download for 24 hrs in February 2014.  Promoted during the Super Bowl (marketing!), for each download, Bank of America donated $1 to the AIDS charity (RED).  The organization was co-founded by Bono, so if a charitable activity could be described as a bit of a "vanity project", I suppose this could.  But when it's for a good cause, I think you can excuse that.

Now, while the free download aspect of this was certainly a sign of things to come in regards to the release of Songs of Innocence, this song was not.  And I really hoped it was.  The atmosphere, the melody, lyrics, vocals, I dug the whole thing.  It did not need to grow on me.  It's a roll the windows down, and turn the volume up kind of tune.  Which was not my reaction to Songs of Innocence (but that's a separate topic).

I’m more than you know
I’m more than you see here
More than you let me be
I’m more than you know
A body in a soul
You don’t see me but you will
I am not invisible

The lyrics speak to the cultural/social burdens a disease like AIDS places on it's victims, and their defiance in the face of that.  But the song could really be about anybody who find themselves in isolating circumstances that they want to break out of it. It's a great song.


Wednesday, December 24, 2014

In 1984/85 Pop Stars taught us the true meaning of Christmas, but who did it better?

The coverage of the ebola outbreak in western Africa, and subsequent release of Band Aid 30's re-recording of Do They Know It's Christmas, got me thinking of the original single's release in 1984, which was soon followed by USA for Africa's We Are the World.  And with no particular criteria in mind, let's take a look at them and decide which is better.

But first, a little background ...

In the fall of 1984 Boomtown Rat's lead singer and Irish pop star Bob Geldof, as a result of being deeply affected by the BBC's reporting of famine in Ethiopia, reached out to his friend, UK pop star and lead singer of Ultra Vox, Midge Urge and together they decided to write a charity single, which resulted in Do They Know It's Christmas.

They brought together the top UK and Irish pop stars of the day to record the single, as well as Americans Jody Watley (who was just starting her solo career, having moved to the UK) and... Kool and the Gang?  Don't get me wrong, they had a top selling album that year, and were still very much a commercial success.  It just seemed like an odd pairing with the UK/Irish stars. But, perhaps that's because...

It wasn't a particularly diverse group.  Pretty much a bunch of white guys, with the overall group representing the styles and sensibilities of Top 40 radio in the UK at the time.  Yeah, Bananarama was there too, but all of the soloists were guys.  

But the song itself?  There's a definite foreboding, a sense of urgency.  The opening bell chimes, are they a call? The celebration of mass?  Perhaps a funeral mass?  Those drums, the haunting backing vocals, and there's the opening lyrics:

It's Christmas time, there's no need to be afraid
At Christmas time, we let in light and we banish shade


You get the sense they're doing it because things are getting grim.  Then there's Bono's ubiquitous lyric (did I use ubiquitous correctly?):

Well, tonight thank God it's them, instead of you

If that isn't calling the listener out, I don't know what is.  It's fairly on the nose, "Hey A-hole, drop to your knees and thank your creator that you and your family aren't watching each other starve to death in a far off place where nobody gives a damn about you."

And the chorus itself?  A hopeful, but a very direct, yet simple, call to action: 

Feed the world, let them know it's Christmas time

Band Aid - Do They Know It's Christmas





Not to be outdone, Quincy Jones, Lionel Richie, and Michael Jackson got together and wrote We Are the World.  They gathered a far more diverse group, representing a spectrum of American pop music, as USA for Africa.  (Oh, yeah. And Dan Aykroyd. Seriously? Dan freakin' Aykroyd.  I officially take back my critique of Kool & The Gang's participation with Band Aid.)

We Are the World, thematically, is the good cop to Do They Know It's Christmas' bad cop.  Yeah, the lyrics have a weight to them, but it's a more hopeful appeal to our better angels. The opening lines:

There comes time, when we heed a certain call
When the world must come together as one 
There are people dying
And it's time to lend a hand to life
The greatest gift of all

it's easy to look back and dismiss this as a bit of a "cheesy" song, that's very much a product of the 80's.  But upon further reflection, it's quite good.  It really is a well crafted American pop song.  Likely in no small part to the performances and pairings that we wouldn't have heard anywhere else.  Tina Turner harmonizing with Billy Joel, Dionne Warwick with Willy Nelson, Springsteen, Loggins, Perry, and Hall on the second chorus, all distinct and inspired.  

Then there's the bridge, with Huey Lewis, Cindy Lauper, and Kim Carnes.  The passion of Bono's emotional smack in the face with "Tonight thank God it's them, instead of you" is easily matched by Lauper's improvised crescendo of "Ay, yay, yeah, yeah!"  Whoa.

Again, you see the diversity.  From the genres of music represented, the prominent presence of female vocalists throughout the song, but then they anchor it with Ray Charles. He wasn't exactly chartin' with the kids at the time, but he was absolutely a piece of American recording history.  And there's an engine of brightness and joy behind his vocals.

USA for Africa - We Are the World




Both songs went on to sell millions of copies and set chart records, and led to the Live Aid mega-concert in the summer of '85.  But I have to give the nod to...

Do They Know It's Christmas

I would have made this the clear cut pick, but when I went back and listened to both, it became more difficult.  They're both good.  But in the end, I think this song just has greater impact, greater urgency.  And it's still played every year during the holidays.  It's aged very well.  I just like it more.


Follow-up versions of both songs were later recorded.  I initially flippantly referred to these as "musical crimes", because I don't think they're very good.  But I recognize the intentions were very noble, the causes important and charitable.  But they just don't hold up next to the originals.  

Band Aid II


Band Aid 20


Band Aid 30


We Are the World 25